Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Religious slights are the buzz as India marks Republic Day

Followers of India's three main religions - Islam, Hinduism, and Sikhism - have balked loudly at cultural slights this week. There's a reason for it, and it's not all politics.

No one likes to have their religion slighted. This is especially true in India, where there are thousands of gods, and tensions are close to the surface when it comes to ill-considered comments about religion.

Skip to next paragraph

Last week, author Salman Rushdie canceled his much anticipated visit to India?s biggest literary festival because of reported threats of assassination. Many Muslims regard his 1988 novel, "Satanic Verses," to be blasphemous, and some Muslim clerics threatened massive protests if Mr. Rushdie showed up at the festival in Jaipur. A handful of authors attempted to read the book ? which is banned in India ? on Rushdie?s behalf in a form of protest, but organizers stopped them.

Just the day before, American late night talk show host Jay Leno managed to offend India?s Sikh community with a satirical sketch, involving the Sikh faith?s holiest shrine, the Golden Temple. In a video showing the homes of the GOP presidential candidates, Leno showed a photo of the Golden Temple, calling it ?Mitt Romney?s summer home on Lake Winnipesaukee.??

But that wasn?t all.

On Jan. 25, a Chicago-based sports commentator offended Hindus in his post-game description of a hockey match between the Chicago Blackhawks and the Nashville Predators. Sportscasters are famous for stretching metaphors to the breaking point, but the Chicago commentator was quoted by Indian websites as saying the Predators were ?swallowing up space like some weird Hindu god."

The objection is to the word ?weird,? which a Nevada-based Hindu community leader Rajan Zed ? president of the Universal Society of Hindus ? said was hurtful to the feelings of the world?s 1 billion Hindu people.

Offending all three of the main faiths of the world?s second largest country is quite a feat. In hockey games this is called a hat trick.

What outsiders generally don't quite grasp about India is that sacredness is woven into almost every act of every day. Unlike post-religious societies, where Westerners may attend church once a week (or once a year), many Indians are constantly aware of their religious duties at work, at play, at meal times. I can't tell you how many times I've sat in the back of a taxi cab, in fear, as a Delhi taxi driver takes his hands off the wheel and puts them together in a sign of respect as he passes a holy shrine.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/csmonitor/globalnews/~3/srm12iWmM0k/Religious-slights-are-the-buzz-as-India-marks-Republic-Day

corn maze icloud apple update apple update download ios 5 pokey find my mac

Monday, January 30, 2012

Apple patent looks to create 'secure magnets' to unlock your device

It's an Apple patent application: please be aware this is unlikely to wind up in your next device, please fasten seat belts and fix your tray table in the fixed and upright position. Inside the bezel of your iDevice or Mac is a magnet that operates a switch -- that will only be activated when a "correlated" magnet inside a key-fob makes contact. That's the thinking behind Cupertino's newest patent application, attempting to turn magnets into a way of keeping your stuff secure. An example listed in the patent is using a stylus with specially encoded magnets to securely unlock an iPad, which we attribute to a zealous patent attorney and not a reversal of the "they blew it" rule. It may sound ridiculous when you first consider it, but given the magnetic-activation of the iPad 2's smart cover, it's not as outlandish as you believe. Still, we'll believe it if we see it in a couple of years.

Apple patent looks to create 'secure magnets' to unlock your device originally appeared on Engadget on Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink Patently Apple  |  sourceUSPTO  | Email this | Comments

Source: http://www.engadget.com/2012/01/28/apple-secure-magnet-patent/

statue of liberty gold rush alaska gold rush alaska the addams family blue bloods temple grandin texas rangers

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Gene Marks: So What If Romney's Rich?

So the news is out. Mitt Romney's rich.

He made more than $20 million in each of the past two years. His effective tax rate was less than 15%. During this time, he made so much that he was able to give over $7 million to his church. He's one of the wealthiest men ever to run for President, with an estimated net worth between $190 and $250 million.

Um...so?

I run a small business. I speak all day to other small business owners. Are we jealous? Hell, yeah! Why? Because we all want to be like Mitt Romney. Isn't that the point?

Is there not a small business owner, an employee at a pharmaceutical company, a guy driving a bus, a steelworker, a school teacher...who also wouldn't like to be like Mitt Romney (without the name "Mitt", of course)? Don't we all want to be rich? Isn't that what we love most about this country - the chance, the potential that one of us could make it big? Like Al Pacino in Scarface. But without all the guns and cocaine. Rich is good. Poor is bad.

Are there downsides to a rich guy as President? Of course. You might get that guy who uses his office for his own personal greed (because some rich guys feel like they never have enough). You might get a guy who's so corporate friendly that he doesn't adequately support those government agencies (the FDA, SEC, DOJ) that work hard in the public interest and keep the bad corporations in check. You could get a guy that's too insensitive to the plight of the many who need government assistance to get on their feet. Or someone who owns a lot of real estate and has a really, really bad hair-do.

In the end I don't care if my President is poor or rich. I just want him to be smart. Communicate well. And have management and political experience. Romney seems to have these characteristics. Oh, and he's rich. Does a rich guy make a bad President? No. In my opinion, it makes him better. Better for my business. Better for the economy.

Like most rich guys, I doubt Romney cares about the money at this point. He's in it for other reasons. Maybe it's ego. Maybe it's a desire to do something good. He's knows that he's always going to be rich, no matter what decisions he makes. And if Romney is one of the richest men ever to run for President then it's likely he doesn't desire more. So he can make decisions that benefit the country, not his own stock portfolio (which he has no knowledge of because it's all in a blind trust anyway).

Maybe that means he can make decisions for the better good without regard as to whether he'll be re-elected. He knows he can always just retire someday and live a comfortable, rich life. I wish I could say the same thing about my small business. Oftentimes many of us make decisions that are more profit motivated instead of for the right reason ("Just ship it already, I'm sure it's fine!"). If we were all richer maybe our decision making would be better.

A rich guy can't be accused of invading a Middle Eastern country to benefit his portfolio of oil stocks. Or giving accommodations to those "fat cats" who might help him out. Why? Because he's already one of them. And he's proud of it. And if he is going to help out those "fat cats" it's probably because he knows it's better for the economy as a whole. Tax breaks for investment bankers? Trade accommodations for the auto industry? Like it or not, rich people know about creating (and keeping) wealth. And in an era of $15 trillion national debt and a $1.3 trillion deficit we could use a few guys who know how to create (and keep) wealth.

That's because a rich guy appreciates what other rich guys do. They invest. They buy companies. They employ people. You know what it's like when you go out to dinner with that "rich" friend of yours and he calculates a 15% tip to the penny. You say to yourself, "well, I guess that's how he got so rich." Exactly! Rich people understand the value of money. They realize that whether it's a 15% tip on a $150 dinner bill or a $1.3 trillion deficit money is still money. It's to be treated with respect, not just printed when more is needed. Small business owners know this as well.

Rich people understand financing. They study leverage. At Bain Capital, Romney raised and invested millions in startups and early stage companies. He did so based on detailed projections and with a specific return on investment in mind. Trust me, he didn't just throw a bunch of money at an entrepreneur, hoping it will "stimulate" him into hiring people and growing. Guys who made it rich know all about risks and rewards. Which is why sometimes their investments tank - that's also part of the game. Small business owners understand that too.

But unfortunately most small business owners who struggle, especially startup entrepreneurs, are all about making the buck, especially until they get established. Lifelong bureaucrats are all about the government providing as much as possible. But rich guys, like successful small business owners, know the balance between earning profits and doing what's right by society. That's why you read about so many business owners who make their companies part of their communities. They fund local events and sponsor local charities. They give money away and they look after their employees. Most realize that once you hit a certain point in your life there's only so much money you can spend. Wealth is more than that. Rich guys want people to be as happy and comfortable as they are.

So from the perspective of a small business owner, what would a rich guy like Romney do as President?

For starters, he wouldn't eliminate the national debt. He knows, like most good business people, that all organizations use debt to grow. There's a right amount of national debt. Greece and Portugal have too much. We're getting to their levels too. Should our national debt be 50% of GDP? 75%? No one really knows. But it should be lower.Guys who aren't rich think that debt is bad. Rich guys know that debt is not bad. In fact, most of them became rich by leveraging their debt at some point in their careers (Romney used debt to invest in companies while at Bain).

A rich guy like Romney would be nicer to other rich guys. Why is it so wrong to make a lot of money? He wouldn't call them names. He wouldn't make populist speeches to agitate the crowds. That's because a rich guy appreciates what other rich guys can do for the economy. These are the guys with money. They're the ones that like to make money. And to make money they need to buy stuff, employ people, make investments and build things. This creates jobs and wealth for everyone. No doubt this will create more wealth for them. But that's what it's all about. Every small business owner knows this too.

A rich President would likely do everything he could to lower taxes, not raise them. If Romney's tax rate was 30% and not 15% he might not be feeling so rich. He might not want to take risks, invest, buy stuff, employ people. He might feel more like hunkering down at home watching the Oprah Network and letting his cash grow moderately in some safe investment. Romney, like many rich people with capital, has enjoyed low capital gain tax rates. He knows how that empowers. Money in your pocket makes you feel good. You invest. You spend.

Rich guys spend their entire lives looking for lower taxes. That's why Romney has his money invested in all sorts of tax saving vehicles and foreign bank accounts. Low tax environments attract capital. Rich guys understand this. A rich President is more pre-disposed to create a low tax environment to attract as much money as possible. And of course this money creates jobs and opportunities and consumer spending.

A rich President would be more corporate friendly. And that's a good thing. Remember when Romney stood outside that plant in Iowa and said "corporations are people"? Rich guys and small business owners get that. They're the ones who build these companies. They know they'd be worth nothing if it weren't for the talented people they employ who earn them their profits. Big companies, big banks, big Wall Street firms - these aren't nameless, faceless facades. hese are people. Hundreds of thousands of people doing their jobs.Just like at our firms. Attacking these big entities is attacking ourselves.

Rich people hate people who don't work. But they love people who at least try. Every successful business owner I personally know tries to give something back. They want to create opportunities for those who want it. Many of my clients fund scholarships, have intern programs, help out an employee's family in time of need. Romney, like most rich guys, supports many of the governmental programs for education and assistance that helps people get on their feet and get a job. They detest welfare. Small business owners and rich guys know that if you've made a lot of money you've likely worked hard to make it. They want to help people help themselves. But not just give money away.

Yeah, Romney's rich. So what?

Another version of this post appears on The Philly Post.

?

Follow Gene Marks on Twitter: www.twitter.com/genemarks

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gene-marks/so-what-if-romneys-rich_b_1227311.html

red ribbon week much ado about nothing sean hayes caroline manzo caroline manzo the haunting in connecticut ashram

`Underworld' sinks teeth into box office with $25M (AP)

LOS ANGELES ? Kate Beckinsale is back with a vengeance, with her latest "Underworld" movie opening at No. 1 this weekend.

"Underworld Awakening" made an estimated $25.4, distributor Sony Screen Gems reported Sunday.

This is the fourth film in the vampire action saga. Beckinsale starred in the first two movies as the warrior Selene, then bowed out of part three but returned for this latest installment. "Underworld Awakening" was shown for the first time in 3-D as well as on IMAX screens, where it made $3.8 million. That's 15 percent of the film's weekend gross, which is a record for an IMAX digital-only run.

Sony had hoped the film would end up in the low-$20 million range. But Rory Bruer, the studio's president of worldwide distribution, says the fact that it did even better ? despite a snow storm that hit much of the Midwest and East Coast ? primarily has to do with Beckinsale's return.

"She is such a force. Her character ? you just can't take your eyes off of her. I know the character is very dear to her, as well, and she just kills it," Bruer said. "The 3-D aspect of the film also brings something, makes it a fun, visceral ride."

Opening in second place was "Red Tails" from executive producer George Lucas, about the Tuskegee Airmen who were the first black fighter pilots to serve in World War II. It made an estimated $19.1 million, according to 20th Century Fox, which was well above expectations; the studio had hoped to reach double digits, said Chris Aronson, executive vice president of domestic distribution.

"I believe what George Lucas has stated all along: This is an important story and a story that must be told. It is a true story of American heroism and valor and audiences have really responded to this message," Aronson said. "People want to feel good about themselves, they want to be uplifted. We have enough hard crud going on in this country right now. Times are tough, and if we look back and are told a story of some really fantastic deeds, that's really compelling moviegoing."

Hollywood.com analyst Paul Dergarabedian said a grass-roots effort to get groups of people into the theaters to see "Red Tails," along with positive word-of-mouth, helped its strong showing. The film saw an uptick from about $6 million on Friday to $8.65 on Saturday.

Overall box office is up 31 percent from the same weekend a year ago, Dergarabedian said, thanks to new releases as well as movies like "Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close," which had limited runs for awards consideration at the end of 2011 and are now expanding nationwide. The 9/11 drama from Warner Bros., starring Tom Hanks and Sandra Bullock, came in fourth place with $10.5 million.

Last week's No. 1 film, the Universal smuggling thriller "Contraband" starring Mark Wahlberg, dropped to the No. 3 spot with $12.2 million. It's now made $46.1 million in two weeks. Meanwhile, Steven Soderbergh's international action picture "Haywire" from Relativity Media, starring mixed martial arts superstar Gina Carano in her first film role, opened in fifth place with $9 million, which was above expectations.

"This is a great, perfect January weekend. You've got these holdover films and newcomers creating an overall marketplace that people are really responding to," Dergarabedian said. "It sounds clich? but this marketplace really has something for everyone."

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Where available, latest international numbers are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

1. "Underworld Awakening," $25.4 million.

2. "Red Tails," $19.1 million.

3. "Contraband," $12.2 million.

4. "Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close," $10.5 million.

5. "Haywire," $9 million.

6. "Beauty and the Beast (3-D)," $8.6 million.

7. "Joyful Noise," $6.1 million.

8. "Mission: Impossible ? Ghost Protocol," $5.5 million.

9. "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows," $4.8 million.

10. "The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo," $3.75 million ($15.7 international).

___

Online:

http://www.hollywood.com

___

AP Movie Writer Christy Lemire can be reached at http://www.twitter.com/christylemire/

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/movies/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20120122/ap_en_mo/us_box_office

national championship cordova beezow doo doo zopittybop bop bop lsu game lsu game truffles truffles

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Bid for Iran nuclear talks confronts old snags

FILE - In this Friday, Aug. 20, 2010 file photo, an Iranian security guard walks past a gate of the Bushehr nuclear power plant as its reactor building is seen in background, just outside the city of Bushehr 750 miles (1,245 kilometers) south of the capital Tehran, Iran. The last time Iran's nuclear envoys held talks with the U.S. and other world powers, the negotiations limped along until a parting shot by the Islamic Republic: Its labs boosted the enrichment levels of uranium in reply to demands for a full-scale freeze. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)

FILE - In this Friday, Aug. 20, 2010 file photo, an Iranian security guard walks past a gate of the Bushehr nuclear power plant as its reactor building is seen in background, just outside the city of Bushehr 750 miles (1,245 kilometers) south of the capital Tehran, Iran. The last time Iran's nuclear envoys held talks with the U.S. and other world powers, the negotiations limped along until a parting shot by the Islamic Republic: Its labs boosted the enrichment levels of uranium in reply to demands for a full-scale freeze. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi, File)

FILE - In this Tuesday, April 3, 2007 file photo, technicians work at the reactor building of the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant, some 750 miles (1,245 kilometers) south of the capital Tehran, Iran. The last time Iran's nuclear envoys held talks with the U.S. and other world powers, the negotiations limped along until a parting shot by the Islamic Republic: Its labs boosted the enrichment levels of uranium in reply to demands for a full-scale freeze.(AP Photo/ISNA, Sot Akbar, File)

(AP) ? The last time Iran's nuclear envoys held talks with the U.S. and other world powers, the negotiations limped along until a parting shot by the Islamic Republic: Its labs boosted the enrichment levels of uranium in reply to demands for a full-scale freeze.

Since then, the standoff has only become tenser. The European Union on Monday joined the U.S. with new sanctions targeting Iran's critical oil exports. Authorities in Tehran fired back with another threat to block tankers in the Persian Gulf ? even while offering to restart international talks after a one-year gap.

Yet one thing hasn't changed since the last round of meetings in January 2011. The chances of Iran agreeing to stop enriching uranium ? the core dispute between Tehran and its foes ? still appear slim.

Iran portrays its ability to make nuclear fuel as akin to a patriotic cause: showcasing the country's technological advances, elevating its international stature and proudly defying Western nuclear controls like other nations in the past ? including North Korea since the 1990s and China in the 1960s.

Iran strongly denies that it seeks nuclear weapons and says it only wants to enrich uranium to fuel reactors for energy and research. But Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has linked control of the entire nuclear cycle to part of Iran's "national identity."

"Iran's right for uranium enrichment is nonnegotiable," said conservative Iranian lawmaker Ali Aghazadeh. "There is no reason for Iran to compromise over its rights. But Iran is open to discussions over concerns about its nuclear program."

The bloc on the other side of the negotiating table ? the five permanent Security Council members plus Germany ? has not publicly spelled out any clear strategies if talks resume in Turkey as a proposed venue. It's highly unlikely, however, that they would back off the insistence that Iran suspend uranium enrichment, which Washington and others fear could lead to weapons-grade nuclear material.

The potential dead ends are clearly marked even before any agreement to reopen dialogue.

Iranian officials hammer the point that halting uranium enrichment is off the agenda. Some in the West, meanwhile, question whether Iran's outreach is simply another tactic to buy time for its nuclear program under pressure from cyberattacks and targeted killings that Tehran has blamed on Israel and its allies.

In Paris last week, French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe said the European Union has made specific proposals for dialogue with Iran, but "unfortunately the country has not committed in a transparent and cooperative way in this process of talks."

On Monday in Brussels, the EU's foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton urged Tehran to offer "some concrete issues to talk about."

"It is very important that it is not just about words; a meeting is not an excuse, a meeting is an opportunity and I hope that they will seize it," she said as the EU adopted its toughest measures yet on Iran with an oil embargo and freeze of the country's central bank assets.

Iranian lawmaker Aghazadeh snapped back: "The West is not seeking a genuine dialogue."

"It's unlikely that any new round of talks will bring any understanding," he added. "There is lack of trust on both sides. Iran won't retreat from its position."

The situation carries strong echoes the last talks in January 2011. When the main talks foundered, Brazil and Turkey tried their hand by reviving proposals to provide Iran with reactor fuel rods from 20 percent enriched uranium in exchange for suspending the enrichment work.

It fell apart when Iran pushed ahead with a pilot program to make its own 20 percent enriched uranium. That's still far below the level needed for a warhead, but it boosts Iran's stockpile of higher-grade nuclear material and was seen as a powerful snub to Western demands.

In a news conference on Saturday, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Ramin Mehmanparast, used the word "justice" to describe what Tehran hopes to achieve from any possible talks.

It covers a lot of ground in explaining Iran's views.

Tehran considers its nuclear program as fully within U.N. rules ? which permit enrichment with oversight ? although U.N. watchdogs and other question how much of Iran's work is secret. Tehran also seeks to shift the nuclear spotlight onto Israel, which is believed to have an atomic arsenal despite its policy of neither confirming nor denying its military capabilities.

But, above all, the Islamic Republic sees its nuclear advancement as an integral part of its self-declared goal of becoming the Muslim world's answer to Western military and technological dominance.

Iran has announced sweeping plans for upgrades to its armed forces, including new warships and surveillance drones similar to the unmanned CIA spy craft captured last month. Iran's state media has claimed aerospace engineers have launched objects into orbit and are working on sending an astronaut into space.

"The nuclear program is a huge part of what's shaping Iran's world view," said Mehrzad Boroujerdi, an Iranian affairs expert at Syracuse University. "Khamenei sees it as part of his legacy. In a way, it's like the nationalization of the Suez Canal for Egypt. It's a defining issue and one of major national importance."

It also is one of the few patches of common ground in a country deeply divided since the clashes and crackdowns after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's disputed re-election in 2009. Even opposition groups that rail against the ruling theocracy often support the nuclear program as a point of pride.

"The issue is protecting national interests," said Iranian political analyst Davoud Hermidas Bavand.

Yet he believes that talks ? even if they at first appear ill-fated ? are the only option to avoid deeper tensions that could lead to a military conflict in the Gulf.

"Talks offer a window to get out of the current impasse," he said.

The question still circles back to whether it could bring some concessions from Iran on uranium enrichment.

Meir Javedanfar, an Iranian-born analyst based in Israel, described Khamenei as stuck between "Obama and a hard place."

Khamenei cannot easily roll back the Iranian nuclear program, but is hit with increasing blows from sanctions that have isolated and eroded Iran's economy.

"Should he ignore it, the Iranian economy, the health of which is crucial to the survival of the regime, could collapse," he wrote in a Sunday commentary.

Keeping the ruling system in place, however, could also drive Iran's nuclear advances closer toward weapons, others contend.

"They perceive the whole nuclear issue as an insurance policy of sorts," said the analyst Boroujerdi. "There are those who say, 'If we are a nuclear power then the West wouldn't dare touch us.' And this, in their mind, helps ensure the survival of the system."

___

Associated Press writer Ali Akbar Dareini in Tehran, Iran, contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-01-24-ML-Iran-Enrichment-Commitment/id-451ada1a076e4f03b96c9f41bf7865b4

walmart black friday ad walmart black friday ad rick perry gaffe rick perry gaffe graham spanier graham spanier penn state board of trustees

Man with locked-in syndrome wants right to die

Former rugby player Tony Nicklinson had a high-flying job as a corporate manager in Dubai, where he went skydiving and bridge-climbing in his free time.

Seven years ago, he suffered a paralyzing stroke. Today he can only move his head, cannot speak and needs constant care.

And he wants to die.

To try to ensure that whoever ends his life won't be jailed, the 57-year-old Nicklinson recently asked Britain's High Court to declare that any doctor who gives him a lethal injection with his consent won't be charged with murder. This week, the court will hold its first hearing on the case.

"Most people who want to die, who are physically able to do so, can lawfully commit suicide," said Nicklinson's lawyer, Saimo Chahal.

But that's not the case for Nicklinson, who has "locked-in syndrome" ? a condition in which a person's body is paralyzed but mind intact.

Under U.K. law, anyone who helps Nicklinson die could be charged with murder, even if they are carrying out his wishes. A murder charge has a mandatory life sentence, regardless of the motive or circumstances.

No one suspected of aiding a loved one's suicide has been charged with such a crime in Britain in recent years. But Nicklinson doesn't want to take any chances. Instead he wants to change the legal definition of murder to exclude euthanasia, arguably a long shot.

Emily Jackson, a medical law expert at London's School of Economics, said Nicklinson may have a plausible case. "He is making a very interesting argument," she said.

Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands but requires a long-term relationship between doctors and patients, a rule that excludes most foreigners. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland, including for foreigners, but Nicklinson does not want to go there to die.

Nicklinson argues that British law hinders his right to "private and family life" ? guaranteed by the European Convention on Human Rights ? on the grounds that being able to choose how to die is a matter of personal autonomy.

  1. Don't miss these Health stories

    1. 'Miracle' baby born from single frozen sperm

      An Ohio man who made no sperm and his wife, who had few eggs, have become parents thanks to a first-ever Cleveland Clinic case in which a single sperm that was frozen and injected into an egg resulted in pregnancy.

    2. 5 diabetes-friendly swaps Paula Deen should try
    3. Teen girls' medical mystery diagnosed as mass hysteria
    4. Does the G-spot really exist? Scientist can't find it
    5. Moving in sync makes people think alike

"He argues that it's unfair on him and that a humane legal system would enable somebody in his circumstances, with considerable safeguards, to get help from a doctor to exercise a right, which he has in theory, but is deprived of in practice," Chahal said.

The Ministry of Justice has applied to dismiss Nicklinson's suit since it could involve changing the law ? which must be done by Parliament, not the High Court.

Nicklinson communicates mostly by using a computer that detects his blinking. In a statement, he described his life as "dull, miserable, demeaning, undignified and intolerable."

He has refused since 2007 to take any life-prolonging drugs recommended by doctors, including heart drugs or blood thinners. He only takes medicines to make himself more comfortable, such as those to reduce muscle spasms. His wife, Jane, a trained nurse, said he could be at risk of another stroke or a heart attack.

Jane described her husband as "a real alpha male" who was very active before his stroke. "He was tall, dark and handsome," she says of the night they met on a blind date in Dubai. The two later also lived in Hong Kong, Malaysia and Britain with their two daughters. Nicklinson chaired a sports club that ran rugby events in the United Arab Emirates, mixing with elite players and officials.

"It was a dream come true for him," his wife said.

Jane said she and their two grown daughters didn't initially agree with her husband's choice to die. "It was very upsetting and obviously it's not what we want, but it's what he wants and it's his life," she said.

Nicklinson spends most of his days at a computer he controls by blinking, writing emails and surfing the web. Jane said he rarely leaves his room in their bungalow in rural Wiltshire, southwest England, except to watch television in the evenings. He's also writing his memoirs.

"It's amazing what he remembers," his wife said. "His mind is completely unaffected."

Like the renowned physicist Stephen Hawking, who recently turned 70, Nicklinson has not lost any of his intellectual capacities. Hawking has Lou Gehrig's disease, a degenerative condition that kills most people within a few years. He has repeatedly said he doesn't think about his physical limitations, which haven't prevented him from revolutionizing the understanding of black holes and the origins of the universe.

A recent British commission headed by a former justice secretary concluded there was a strong case for allowing assisted suicide under strict criteria. The commission was set up and funded by campaigners who want the current law changed. The report did not support euthanasia and recommended assisted suicide only be allowed for terminally ill people, which would exclude Nicklinson.

In 2009, the British government's top prosecutor said people who helped terminally ill relatives and friends die were unlikely to be charged if they acted out of compassion. From 2009 to 2011, 40 cases of people suspected of helping loved ones die were reported to the government prosecutor; none was charged.

In 2002, the Netherlands became the first country to legalize euthanasia, allowing doctors to end the lives of patients whose suffering is "unbearable and hopeless" ? not just those with terminal illnesses. In recent years, the country's rates of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide have risen slightly, but still account for less than 3 percent of all deaths.

Switzerland allows doctors to prescribe a fatal dose of medicine for patients to take themselves. Since 2001, more than 160 Britons have traveled to the Dignitas clinic, near Zurich, to die.

Nicklinson considered going to Switzerland, but his wife said he decided against it for several reasons, including the approximately 6,500 pound ($10,000) cost. Nicklinson is currently receiving legal aid from the government to cover most of his lawyer's fees.

Euthanasia is also legal in Belgium, Luxembourg and the state of Oregon in the United States.

Critics of euthanasia say the U.K. should focus more on improving care for the chronically and terminally ill instead of legislating mercy killing.

"I'm massively sympathetic to (Nicklinson's) situation, but I don't think we should change the law when it will impact hundreds of thousands of other people," said Dr. John Wiles, chairman of Care Not Killing, an alliance that opposes euthanasia. He warned that legalizing euthanasia might worsen treatment of elderly people and the terminally ill.

Wiles doubted enough safeguards could ever be in place. "However narrow you try to make it, in principle, we would be allowing the killing of other members of society for the first time," he said. "If we change the law, we'll be saying to people, 'If you don't like the care you're getting, you can just end it.'"

The British Medical Association also opposes any changes that would permit assisted suicide or euthanasia. While patients have the right to their medical records, the group advises doctors to refuse to share such reports if they suspect the information will be used to commit assisted suicide abroad.

Nicklinson's wife, Jane, said her husband simply wants the right to choose when to end his life. She said he began asking to die as soon as he could start communicating after his stroke, once he realized he wouldn't improve.

"I've tried many times to change his mind, but he is adamant to see this through," she said.

Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46099909/ns/health-health_care/

light field camera world series game 1 exotic animals exotic animals scott hall lra lra

Monday, January 23, 2012

Domain Investing: ?Weird, Arcane and Occasionally Profitable ...

There?s an article about domain names that I found interesting on NorthJersey.com, an online publication covering northern New Jersey news and people. ?The article is primarily about the sale of 45.com and the story behind it, which is described?as ?a window into the weird, arcane and occasionally profitable world of Internet domain names.??The former owner of 45.com is Glen DiGirolamo, who is from Wayne, New Jersey.

I?ll let you read the article for yourself, but I thought it was pretty neat how?DiGirolamo was able to come into possession of the domain name, and how he stuck to his asking price to make a solid profit on the sale.?I don?t really agree with the author?s description of the domain business being weird or arcane (maybe 10+ years ago), but it was interesting to read.

Do you have any similar stories about acquisitions or sales that you?d like to share?

Related posts:

  1. To Make Money Investing in Domain Names, You Have to Put The Time In I am frequently asked how I know what names to...
  2. Differences Between Domain Investing and Cybersquatting I had a conversation a few days ago with someone...
  3. Political Side of ccTLD Domain Investing This isn?t a political blog, and I hate politics anyway,...

Source: http://www.elliotsblog.com/domain-investing-weird-arcane-and-occasionally-profitable-4055

49ers vs giants joe flacco joe paterno school closings giants vs 49ers san francisco 49ers san francisco 49ers